Case Studies
We measure success in business outcomes -- not impressions, not clicks, not "engagement." Here is what that looks like.
Enterprise Fintech Client
A financial services company specializing in business lending needed a Google Ads program built from the ground up. No existing campaigns, no historical data, no conversion tracking -- a blank slate requiring full-stack paid media architecture.
The client had never run paid search. There was no campaign structure, no keyword research, no conversion tracking, and no historical performance data to build from. The team needed a partner who could architect the entire system -- strategy, structure, measurement, and ongoing optimization -- from day one.
The approved budget was significant -- six figures for 2026. That level of spend demands precision from the start. Every dollar spent without proper tracking or structure is a dollar wasted, and the gap between "running ads" and "running a system" compounds quickly at scale.
We started with strategy, not tactics. Before a single ad went live, we built the foundation:
Performance improved every month. Not because we got lucky, but because the structural approach compounds -- each month's data informed the next month's optimization.
| Metric | Month 1 | Month 2 | Month 3 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conversions | Baseline | +289% | +243% vs Month 1 | 3x growth sustained |
| Spend | Test budget | Scaled 4x | Optimized allocation | Scaled with performance |
| CAC | Strong baseline | +26% (scale-up expected) | -22% vs Month 2 | Best-in-class by Month 3 |
| CTR | 10%+ | 16%+ | 12%+ | Strong across all months |
| CPC | Low baseline | +80% (expanded targeting) | -22% M/M | Optimized down month over month |
| Conv Rate | <1% | 4.5%+ | 4.5%+ | 13x improvement from launch |
| Reach | Baseline | +79% | +114% vs Month 1 | Growing reach with efficiency |
Month 1
Campaign launched from scratch. Focused on building conversion data, validating keyword hypotheses, and establishing baseline metrics. Strong proof of concept with minimal test spend -- solid CAC and positive unit economics from day one.
Month 2
Budget scaled 4x as Month 1 data proved the model. Conversions jumped 289%. CAC rose 26% as we expanded targeting -- expected during scale-up. CTR hit 16%+ as ad copy resonated at higher volumes.
Month 3
This is where structural marketing shows its value. Using two months of accumulated signal, we optimized aggressively: CAC dropped 22% to best-in-class levels, CPC fell 22%, and conversion rate held above 4.5%. The system was compounding.
This was not a matter of finding the right keywords or writing clever ad copy. The results came from the structural approach:
The campaign continues to perform with a significant approved annual budget. Performance is exceeding all targets, and the structural model we built in Q1 continues to compound as more data feeds the optimization engine.
Entertainment Company (Confidential)
An entertainment company with significant marketing spend needed a rapid stabilization across email, SEO, paid media, and PR. In 30 days, we delivered measurable cash contribution improvements through a coordinated multi-channel approach.
The engagement revealed inefficient vendor relationships (PR firm audit yielded five-figure savings), email deliverability issues reducing revenue (improved 14%), and paid media ROAS below 1x (brought to 2x within 30 days). The 30/90/180-day framework we applied has since become our standard engagement model.
We work with companies who understand that marketing is not a cost center -- it is a growth engine. If that sounds like you, let us talk.
Start a Conversation